Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of WikiStart/CPPLayer

Timestamp:

05/20/15 16:11:18 (5 years ago)

Author:

sylvain.joyeux

Comment:

--

WikiStart/CPPLayer

@@ -8 +8 @@
 * Extend orocos.cpp layer with model layer
  * Use cpp model layer to use it for dynamic_properties and the orocos.rb extension
+   * ??? What does this mean ?
  * make ruby-binding for this part that allows ruby-tooling the model checking
- * 
+   * '''Sylvain''' there is zero interest from my side in using C++ bindings from the Ruby tooling. I do plan to extend the '''use of models''' in the ruby tooling, and a transition like this would most likely hold these plans back a few years, with zero benefit (only cost, a.k.a. the reduced speed of development as one now needs to modify C++ *and* the bindings, plus the inability to move away from the CRuby implementation to more realtime-friendly ones such as e.g. JRuby). The ruby side of things really has no need for this, using C++ bindings is really only adding problems and complexity.
 * Create model-files from orogen 
  * create (yml?) Task-description files from orogen that can be parsed and somewhere outside the ruby tooling
@@ -15 +16 @@
 === Future thoughts ===
 * Use language independent descriptions between parts of syskit (work of AG-Framework)
+  '''Sylvain''' This is non-sensical. You can create language-independent representations and add the ability for Syskit to load and save them. Using them as the mean of communication between the Syskit modules would basically be: marshal roby plan into independent representation -> pass independent representation -> unmarshal roby plan from independent representation. This is as dumb as making the yml-representation the way to load models in orocos.rb/syskit: both libraries use orogen to represent their models, using orogen's native representation is really a lot less dumb than using some marshalled version of it.